BLUE TRAINIf you would like to schedule an in-person training for ATC-20 Postearthquake Safety Evaluation of Buildings (Second Edition), ATC-45 Safety Evaluation of Buildings after Windstorms and Floods, please click here for details and to submit a request for more information. 

 

Call for Consultants

ATC is committed to building a workforce that is as diverse as the communities we serve. Are you interested in consulting? Join us!

PROJECT OVERVIEW

Title:14th U.S.-Japan Workshop on the Improvement of Structural Design and Construction Practices

Project Status: This Workshop was conducted on December 3-5, 2012

Sponsors: Applied Technology Council (ATC) and Japan Structural Consultants Association (JSCA)

 

PROJECT SUMMARY

The Purpose of the Workshop is to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas and information relating to the improvement of current building design and construction practices in the United States and Japan. The special focus of this Workshop will be on issues relating to the performance of buildings and other structures in severe earthquakes, including the effects of tsunami, and response and recovery.

The Workshop is the 14th in a series started in 1984, and repeated every two-to-three years. Previous workshops have been held in California (San Diego and San Francisco), Hawaii (Honolulu, Kauai, Kona, Kohala Coast, and Maui), Japan (Kobe and Tokyo), and Victoria, British Columbia.

Workshop Participants.  The Workshop Participants included those with a background in building performance and other structures in severe earthquakes, including the effects of tsunami, and response and recovery.

Workshop Program.  The Workshop Program was designed for practicing structural engineers and researchers, and included technical presentations, and working group breakout sessions and discussions. Papers and presentations were as follows:

Paper Number Paper Title Author Presentation Paper

1.

Brief Review of Building Damage by the 2011 Tohoku Japan Earthquake and Following Coping Activities Isao Nishiyama*, Izuru Okawa, Hiroshi Fukuyama, and Yasuo Okuda

2.

Structural Analysis Case Studies of Buildings Damaged During the Tohoku Tsunami Lyle Carden*, G. Chock, I. Robertson, and G. Yu

3.

Categorization of Damage to Buildings Caused by the March 2011 Tsunami Hiroshi Fukuyama*, Y. Okuda, H. Kato, T. Ishihara, S. Tajiri, T. Kabeyasawa, and M. Tani

4.

Current Tsunami Design Guidance in the United States – FEMA P-646 (2012) Ian N. Robertson*

5.

Structural Design Requirement on the Tsunami Evacuation Buildings Hiroshi Fukuyama*, Y. Okuda, H. Kato, T. Ishihara, S. Tajiri, T. Kabeyasawa, and Y. Nakano

6.

ASCE 7 and the Development of a Tsunami Building Code for the U.S. Gary Chock *

7.

Performance of Base-Isolated Buildings During the 2011 East Japan Earthquake Yoshikazu Fukusawa*

8.

Drift Issues of Tall Buildings under the March 11, 2011 M9.0 Tohoku Earthquake, Japan - Implications Mehmet Celebi*

9.

Performance of Seismically Isolated Buildings due to 2011 Tohoku Earthquake Mineo Takayama*

10.

Countermeasures for Long-Period Ground Motion Takaharu Fukuda*, N. Koshika, and H. Kitamura

11.

Dynamic Instability in High-Rise Steel Structures Subjected to Strong Ground Motions: A Review Kohji Ikago*

12.

Simulated Earthquake Ground Motion for Structural Design Satoru Nagase*

13.

The 2010-2011 Canterbury New Zealand Earthquakes and the Emergency Management of Buildings and Infrastructure Peter R. Wood*, D. Brunsdon, J. Hare, M. Stannard, and B. Galloway

14.

The Effectiveness of Post-Earthquake Building Safety Evaluations Carried out in the Canterbury Earthquake Sequence and Proposals for Future Development Bruce Galloway*, D. Brunsdon, J. Hare, M. Stannard, and P. Wood

15.

Lessons from the Postearthquake Safety Evaluation in the 2010-2011 Christchurch, New Zealand Earthquakes and Implications for Updating ATC-20 Bret Lizundia* and R. Gallagher

16.

Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Old Buildings Located Along the Specific Emergency Transportation Roads in Tokyo Toshio Okoshi*

17.

Recovery Cooperation for Padang Earthquake Damage by Seismic Isolation Buildings Design Takayuki Teramoto*

18.

Some Examples of Plan and Activity in Re-Construction from the 2011 Great East Japan
Earthquake
Mitsuru Kawamura*

19.

Building Seismically Resilient Communities by Effective Seismic Risk Reduction and Disaster Reconstruction Programs H. Kit Miyamoto* and Amir S.J. Gilani

20.

Special Presentation:  52-Year Application of Seismic Provisions to Major Research Facilities Roland Sharpe*  

21.

Transparent Global Earthquake Risk and Loss Estimation Nicole Keller* and H. K. Miyamoto

22.

Performance of Buildings under the Coming Mid-size Earthquake Beneath Tokyo Metropolitan Area Yozo Shinozaki*

23.

Risk Management and Loss Estimation Lessons from the Real World Peter Yanev* and A. Yanev

24.

San Francisco’s Community Action Plan for Seismic Safety Christopher Rojahn*, L. Kornfield, L. Tobin, and L. Samant

25.

Seismic Actions of Nonstructural Components Hiroshi Ito*

26.

The Horizon for Next-Generation Performance Assessment of Buildings is Here:  FEMA P-58 Jon A. Heintz*

27.

Use of Performance Based Engineering Criteria in Motivating Residential Seismic Retrofit Kelly Cobeen

28.

Seismic Dampers:  How High Performance Devices Change the World H. Kit Miyamoto and A. M. Gilani

29.

Performance Evaluation of a Building Structure with Nonlinear Dampers under Strong Ground Motion on March 11, 2011 Isao Nishimura*

30.

Seismic Retrofit of Ductile Concrete Moment-Resisting Frames With Innovative Pin-Supported Wall System Hiroyasu Sakata, Z. Qu, S. Midorikawa, and A. Wada

31.

Seismic Retrofit of the Tower Structure with Viscous Dampers Nobuyuki Kurauchi*

32.

Mission, Goals and Social Responsibility of Structural Engineers Akira Wada*

*Presenting Author

Print

 

 Welcome to the ATC Team!

Valley Mike cropMichael Valley As a former Principal at Magnusson Klemencic Associates in Seattle, Mike Valley comes to ATC with more than 30 years of structural engineering experience in new design, evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings, applied research, and codes and standards development. Mike’s design experience includes the landmark Salesforce Tower in San Francisco, and his research and development experience includes the FEMA 356 Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA P-2012 Assessing Seismic Performance of Buildings with Configuration Irregularities (ATC-123 Project), and NIST GCR 10-917-9 Applicability of Nonlinear Multiple-Degree-of-Freedom Modeling for Design (ATC-76-6 Project).

Mike also has extensive experience as an ATC consultant serving as a reviewer, a technical contributor, and Project Director on multiple ATC projects. We look forward to how Mike’s unique experiences as a successful team member will contribute to ATC projects in the future.

Michael Mahoney
Michael Mahoney

Retired from federal service as a Senior Geophysicist with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Mike Mahoney comes to ATC with more than 30 years of experience in hazard mitigation program management and policy development, post-disaster response and recovery, and problem-focused research and development in support of FEMA’s efforts under the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP). He has led FEMA’s earthquake-related work with the International Code Council and has been involved with the development of national model codes and standards since 1984.

In his career at FEMA, Mike has led the development of countless major FEMA publications, including: FEMA 350 Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings and its series of companion reports (ATC-41 Project series), FEMA P-58 Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings, Methodology and Implementation (ATC-58 Project series), FEMA P-695 Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors (ATC-63 Project), FEMA P-2018 Seismic Evaluation of Older Concrete Buildings for Collapse Potential (ATC-78 Project), and FEMA P-2090/NIST SP-1254 Recommended Options for Improving the Built Environment for Post-Earthquake Reoccupancy and Functional Recovery Time (ATC-137 Project). With Mike’s extensive knowledge of federal government programs, and past collaboration with state and local agencies, hazard mitigation partners, and code development organizations, we look forward to how his unique experiences will help serve ATC’s client needs and objectives in the future.